Studies: Difference between revisions

From Independence of Québec
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Mathieugp (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Mathieugp (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
If the conclusions of studies are not facts, they are supposed to be based on facts, making it possible to use them, in part or in total to support arguments.


== Governmental studies ==
== Governmental studies ==
Line 13: Line 12:
* 1953: Tremblay Royal Commission of Inquiry on Constitutional Problems
* 1953: Tremblay Royal Commission of Inquiry on Constitutional Problems
* 1940: Rowell-Dafoe-Sirois Royal Commission on Dominion-Provincial Relations
* 1940: Rowell-Dafoe-Sirois Royal Commission on Dominion-Provincial Relations
== Analysis of opinions ==
* [http://www.iigr.ca/pdf/publications/139_The_Evolution_of_Support.pdf The Evolution of Support for Sovereignty ­ Myths and Realities], by Claire Durand, Department of Sociology, Université de Montréal, 2001 (PDF)
* http://www.mapageweb.umontreal.ca/durandc/Recherche/Publications/refer1d2_eng.pdf
* http://www.mapageweb.umontreal.ca/durandc/queens/index.html


== General academic resources ==
== General academic resources ==

Revision as of 19:13, 19 December 2006

Governmental studies

Analysis of opinions

General academic resources

In French