Studies: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If the conclusions of studies are not facts, they are supposed to be based on facts, making it possible to use them, in part or in total to support arguments. | |||
== Governmental studies == | == Governmental studies == | ||
Revision as of 19:07, 19 December 2006
If the conclusions of studies are not facts, they are supposed to be based on facts, making it possible to use them, in part or in total to support arguments.
Governmental studies
- See the list of Federal Royal Commissions
- 2001: Summary of the Final Report of the Estates General on the situation and future of the French Language (PDF)
- 1991: The Allaire Report
- 1991: Parliamentary Commitee to Examine Matters Relating to the Accession of Québec to Sovereignty (2002 Update)
- 1990: Commission on the Political and Constitutional Future of Québec (2002 Update)
- 1978: The Pépin Robarts Commission - Task Force on Canadian Unity
- 1972: The Gendron Commission of Inquiry on the Situation of the French Language and Linguistic Rights in Quebec
- 1963: Laurendeau-Dunton Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism
- 1953: Tremblay Royal Commission of Inquiry on Constitutional Problems
- 1940: Rowell-Dafoe-Sirois Royal Commission on Dominion-Provincial Relations
General academic resources
- International Association of Québec Studies
- American Council for Québec Studies
- Questia Library: Quebec nationalism
- Centre for Québec Studies - University of Leicester (UK)
- Québec Directory of Public Research
- Québec Studies Program
- Association for Canadian Studies
- Search University of Toronto Journals
- ISUMA : Canadian Journal of Policy Research
- Institute for Research on Public Policy
- Center for World Indigenous Studies
- Social Science Information Gateway: Politics