We are Québécois - Revision history

Mathieugp: Redirected page to Option Québec

2010-12-06T00:01:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:01, 6 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~From ''An Option for Quebec'' by René Lévesque, Published by Sogides Ltee.~~		#REDIRECT [[Option Québec]]
	~~----~~

	~~We are ''Québécois''.~~

	What that means first and foremost—and if it need be, all that it means—is that we are attached to this one corner of the Earth where we can be completely ourselves; this Quebec, the only place where we have the unmistakable feeling that “here we can really be at home”.

	~~Being ourselves is essentially a matter of keeping and developing a~~ [[~~personality]] that has survived for three and a half centuries.~~

	~~At the core of this personality is the fact that we speak French. Everything else depends on this one essential element and follows from it or leads us infallibly back to it.~~

	In our history, America began with a French look, briefly but gloriously given it by [[Champlain]], [[Jolliet]], [[La Salle]], [[La Vérendrye]] ... We learned our first lessons in progress and perseverance from [[Maisonneuve]], [[Jeanne Mance]], [[Jean Talon]]; and in daring or heroism from [[Lambert Closse]], [[Brébeuf]], [[Frontenac]], [[d'Iberville]] ...

	~~Then came the [[Conquest]]. We were a conquered people, our hearts set on surviving in some small way on a continent that had become [[Anglo-Saxon]].~~

	Somehow or other, through countless changes and a variety of regimes, despite difficulties without number (our lack of awareness and even our ignorance serving all too often as our best protection), we succeeded.

	Here again, when we recall the major historical landmarks, we come upon a profusion of names: [[Etienne Parent]] and [[Lafontaine]] and the [[Patriotes of ’37]]; [[Louis Riel]] and [[Honoré Mercier]], [[Bourassa]], [[Philippe Hamel]]; [[Garneau]] and [[Edouard Montpetit]] and [[Asselin]] and [[Lionel Groulx]] ~~... For each of them, the main driving force behind every action was the will to continue, and the tenacious hope that they could make it worthwhile.~~

	Until recently in this difficult process of survival we enjoyed the protection of a certain degree of isolation. We lived a relatively sheltered life in a rural society in which a great measure of unanimity reigned, and in which poverty set its limits on change and aspirations alike.

	We are children of that society, in which the habitant, our father or grandfather, was still the key citizen. We also are heirs to that fantastic adventure—that early America that was almost entirely French. We are, even more intimately, heirs to the group obstinacy which has kept alive that portion of French America we call Quebec.

Mathieugp at 21:17, 7 June 2007

2007-06-07T21:17:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 7 June 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	From ''An Option for Quebec'' by René Lévesque, Published by Sogides Ltee.		From ''An Option for Quebec'' by René Lévesque, Published by Sogides Ltee.
			----

	We are ''Québécois''.		We are ''Québécois''.

Mathieugp at 21:17, 7 June 2007

2007-06-07T21:17:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 7 June 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~We are Québécois~~.		From ''An Option for Quebec'' by René Lévesque, Published by Sogides Ltee.

	~~What that means first and foremost—and if it need be, all that it means—is that we~~ are ~~attached to this one corner of the earth where we can be completely ourselves; this Quebec, the only place where we have the unmistakable feeling that “here we can really be at home~~.”		We are ''Québécois''.

	Being ourselves is essentially a matter of keeping and developing a personality that has survived for three and a half centuries.		What that means first and foremost—and if it need be, all that it means—is that we are attached to this one corner of the Earth where we can be completely ourselves; this Quebec, the only place where we have the unmistakable feeling that “here we can really be at home”.

			Being ourselves is essentially a matter of keeping and developing a [[personality]] that has survived for three and a half centuries.

	At the core of this personality is the fact that we speak French. Everything else depends on this one essential element and follows from it or leads us infallibly back to it.		At the core of this personality is the fact that we speak French. Everything else depends on this one essential element and follows from it or leads us infallibly back to it.

	In our history, America began with a French look, briefly but gloriously given it by Champlain, Jolliet, La Salle, La Vérendrye . . . .We learned our first lessons in progress and perseverance from Maisonneuve, Jeanne Mance, Jean Talon; and in daring or heroism from Lambert Closse, Brébeuf, Frontenac, d'Iberville . . . .		In our history, America began with a French look, briefly but gloriously given it by [[Champlain]], [[Jolliet]], [[La Salle]], [[La Vérendrye]] ... We learned our first lessons in progress and perseverance from [[Maisonneuve]], [[Jeanne Mance]], [[Jean Talon]]; and in daring or heroism from [[Lambert Closse]], [[Brébeuf]], [[Frontenac]], [[d'Iberville]] ...

	Then came the ~~conquest~~. We were a conquered people, our hearts set on surviving in some small way on a continent that had become Anglo-Saxon.		Then came the [[Conquest]]. We were a conquered people, our hearts set on surviving in some small way on a continent that had become [[Anglo-Saxon]].

	Somehow or other, through countless changes and a variety of regimes, despite difficulties without number (our lack of awareness and even our ignorance serving all too often as our best protection), we succeeded.		Somehow or other, through countless changes and a variety of regimes, despite difficulties without number (our lack of awareness and even our ignorance serving all too often as our best protection), we succeeded.

	Here again, when we recall the major historical landmarks, we come upon a profusion of names: Etienne Parent and Lafontaine and the Patriotes of ’37; Louis Riel and Honoré Mercier, Bourassa, Philippe Hamel; Garneau and Edouard Montpetit and Asselin and Lionel Groulx . . . . For each of them, the main driving force behind every action was the will to continue, and the tenacious hope that they could make it worthwhile.		Here again, when we recall the major historical landmarks, we come upon a profusion of names: [[Etienne Parent]] and [[Lafontaine]] and the [[Patriotes of ’37]]; [[Louis Riel]] and [[Honoré Mercier]], [[Bourassa]], [[Philippe Hamel]]; [[Garneau]] and [[Edouard Montpetit]] and [[Asselin]] and [[Lionel Groulx]] ... For each of them, the main driving force behind every action was the will to continue, and the tenacious hope that they could make it worthwhile.

	Until recently in this difficult process of survival we enjoyed the protection of a certain degree of isolation. We lived a relatively sheltered life in a rural society in which a great measure of unanimity reigned, and in which poverty set its limits on change and aspirations alike.		Until recently in this difficult process of survival we enjoyed the protection of a certain degree of isolation. We lived a relatively sheltered life in a rural society in which a great measure of unanimity reigned, and in which poverty set its limits on change and aspirations alike.

	We are children of that society, in which the habitant, our father or grandfather, was still the key citizen. We also are heirs to that fantastic adventure—that early America that was almost entirely French. We are, even more intimately, heirs to the group obstinacy which has kept alive that portion of French America we call Quebec.		We are children of that society, in which the habitant, our father or grandfather, was still the key citizen. We also are heirs to that fantastic adventure—that early America that was almost entirely French. We are, even more intimately, heirs to the group obstinacy which has kept alive that portion of French America we call Quebec.

	~~From An Option for Quebec by Rene Lévesque~~
	~~Published by Sogides Ltee.~~

Mathieugp at 06:20, 7 June 2007

2007-06-07T06:20:44Z

New page

We are Québécois.

What that means first and foremost—and if it need be, all that it means—is that we are attached to this one corner of the earth where we can be completely ourselves; this Quebec, the only place where we have the unmistakable feeling that “here we can really be at home.”

Being ourselves is essentially a matter of keeping and developing a personality that has survived for three and a half centuries.

At the core of this personality is the fact that we speak French. Everything else depends on this one essential element and follows from it or leads us infallibly back to it.

In our history, America began with a French look, briefly but gloriously given it by Champlain, Jolliet, La Salle, La Vérendrye . . . .We learned our first lessons in progress and perseverance from Maisonneuve, Jeanne Mance, Jean Talon; and in daring or heroism from Lambert Closse, Brébeuf, Frontenac, d'Iberville . . . .

Then came the conquest. We were a conquered people, our hearts set on surviving in some small way on a continent that had become Anglo-Saxon.

Somehow or other, through countless changes and a variety of regimes, despite difficulties without number (our lack of awareness and even our ignorance serving all too often as our best protection), we succeeded.

Here again, when we recall the major historical landmarks, we come upon a profusion of names: Etienne Parent and Lafontaine and the Patriotes of ’37; Louis Riel and Honoré Mercier, Bourassa, Philippe Hamel; Garneau and Edouard Montpetit and Asselin and Lionel Groulx . . . . For each of them, the main driving force behind every action was the will to continue, and the tenacious hope that they could make it worthwhile.

Until recently in this difficult process of survival we enjoyed the protection of a certain degree of isolation. We lived a relatively sheltered life in a rural society in which a great measure of unanimity reigned, and in which poverty set its limits on change and aspirations alike.

We are children of that society, in which the habitant, our father or grandfather, was still the key citizen. We also are heirs to that fantastic adventure—that early America that was almost entirely French. We are, even more intimately, heirs to the group obstinacy which has kept alive that portion of French America we call Quebec.

From An Option for Quebec by Rene Lévesque
Published by Sogides Ltee.