wikieditor
10,503
edits
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
[...] Another way of derealising French Canada is to only accept its administrative translation as a province. "Quebec is a province like the others", which amounts to accepting the reality of the French-Canadian culture only according to the legalist terms of the Confederation which regionalizes and provincializes this culture. This reasoning is the inversion of the other according to the size of the confrontation pole but the same reasoning, structurally, in that it retracts the French-Canada English-Canada axis which, historically and politically, is constitutive, which does not exclude the multidimensional relations of French Canada with the world and history. | [...] Another way of derealising French Canada is to only accept its administrative translation as a province. "Quebec is a province like the others", which amounts to accepting the reality of the French-Canadian culture only according to the legalist terms of the Confederation which regionalizes and provincializes this culture. This reasoning is the inversion of the other according to the size of the confrontation pole but the same reasoning, structurally, in that it retracts the French-Canada English-Canada axis which, historically and politically, is constitutive, which does not exclude the multidimensional relations of French Canada with the world and history. | ||
Altogether, our thinkers on several occasions refused the historical dialectic which defines us and called upon another dialectic which, by widening the confrontation or by reducing it excessively, meant a refusal to look at French Canada as a global culture. This refusal has constituted the ideological basis to several systems of thought in Canada. | |||
Our thinkers deployed a big logical apparatus to exit out of the French-Canadian dialectic which remains, still today, exhausting, depressing, inferiorizing for the French Canadian. The "how to get out of it?" was the fundamental problem of our thinkers and their dialectic runaways do nothing but tragically express this morbid taste for exile which our letters, since Crémazie, do nothing but resound. | |||
What they have fled, in ideological wasting or travels, it is an untenable condition of subordination, of contempt for oneself and one's own, of bitterness, of uninterrupted tiredness and a reaffirmed desire to no longer undertake anything. | |||
The French Canadian often presents himself, through his highest spokesmen, as a blasé people which believes neither in himself nor in anything. The self-devaluation accomplished its evil, after so long, and if it were necessary to quote but one proof of it, I would mention the delirious over-evaluation in which now gives the French Canadian separatist. He fights his own sides, but it should be said, to excuse him, that if he does not do it, he very well risks, conditioned as he is to depression and to the defeat, to think of himself as the last of idiots and his own milieu never fails to let him know. | |||
"Cet extrait est tiré du livre Mélanges littéraires II Comprendre dangereusement, édition critique établie par Jacinthe Martel avec la collaboration de Claude Lamy, Leméac éditeur (Bibliothèque québécoise), 1995. | "Cet extrait est tiré du livre Mélanges littéraires II Comprendre dangereusement, édition critique établie par Jacinthe Martel avec la collaboration de Claude Lamy, Leméac éditeur (Bibliothèque québécoise), 1995. | ||
Le Devoir | Le Devoir <br /> | ||
Friday, November 10, 2006 |