Pro arguments: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 65: Line 65:
===Failure of constitutional reforms===
===Failure of constitutional reforms===


Understood to be a pact between two founding peoples, the confederation of 1867 was not always rejected by a majority of Quebec nationalists. The failure of constitutional talks in 1971, 1982, 1989 and 1992 has pushed yet more so called "soft" nationalists to adopt the sovereignist thesis.
Understood by Quebec to be a pact between two founding peoples, the "confederation" of 1867 was not always rejected by a majority of Quebec nationalists. The failure of constitutional talks in 1971, 1982, 1989 and 1992 has pushed yet more so called "soft" nationalists to adopt the sovereignist thesis that the time has come for Quebecers to stop asking for permissions to an authority that does not respect them, draft their own constitution and assume all their responsibilities toward themselves.


* Read [http://www.bibliotheque.assnat.qc.ca/01/mono/2005/08/819576.pdf Canadian federalism and the autonomy of Québec: a historical viewpoint] by Marc Chevrier (PDF)
* Read [http://www.bibliotheque.assnat.qc.ca/01/mono/2005/08/819576.pdf Canadian federalism and the autonomy of Québec: a historical viewpoint] by Marc Chevrier (PDF)
wikieditor
10,503

edits

Navigation menu