Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
----
On the impetus of the [[Wikipedia:Michaud Affair|Michaud Affair]], I was on several occasions personally hailed by the various information media, by my fellow-citizens in general and [[sovereignist]]s ones in particular. Precisely, I have to date made at least four public interventions: one, at the [[http://www.radio-canada.ca/radio/ radio of Radio-Canada]], during the program ''[[http://www.radio-canada.ca/radio/sansfrontieres/ Sans Frontières]]'' hosted by [[Michel Desautels]], last December 19; a second one, by the means of a letter to the newspaper ''[[Wikipedia:Le Devoir|Le Devoir]]'', published last December 21, of which I was one of the five sovereignist signatories member of cultural communities; a third one, in the form of an interview granted to journalist [[Alexandre Sirois]] of the newspaper ''[[Wikipedia:La Presse (Canada)|La Presse]],'' published in the edition of last December 23 and finally, a fourth one, the same day, in the form of an interview granted to the [[Wikipedia:Réseau de l'information|RDI network]].
I thus make a point of reassuring those who like Mr [[Normand Breault]] regretted not to never see "other members of the Jewish community coming in to moderate, and even less to contradict their spokesmen" and wondered "when, if there are any, will the dissidents make their opinions known" so that "the other Quebecers may realize that the Jewish community is not as monolithic as it appears to be." (Article published in ''Le Devoir'', last December 27)
The Quebec of the future will not be built without the contribution of its various [minority] cultural groups. The project of building a country out of Quebec, which 60% of the French-speaking people dream of, deserves a greater opening among the other ethnic communities of Quebec. To make them take their full part in the development of this project, it is first necessary to make more room, within political caucuses, organizations and governmental institutions, to the sympathizers coming from cultural communities.
The main idea supporting my analysis is as follows: the future of Quebec depends primarily on three major components of Quebec society, taking into account their demographic weight, their economic importance and their political influence, that is to say the French majority, the English minority and the [other] cultural or ethnic communities, while retaining the contribution of the ''aboriginal nations autochtones''.
It is probably true that Anglo-Quebecers find it very beneficial to considered themselves in Quebec as the worthy representatives of the majority and dominant group in Canada. In the same way, it is quite legitimate for the first generations of immigrants to loyally remain indebted to their host country, Canada, and to nourish their dream of belonging to a great North-American nation. It remains nonetheless that a good number of them recognize the power of the ''forces vives'' of French-speaking Quebec which tends unrelentingly towards the emancipation of its people and its autonomy, its sovereignty, its recognition and its participation in the concert of nations.
wikieditor
10,502

edits

Navigation menu